{"id":1605,"date":"2024-08-05T08:54:29","date_gmt":"2024-08-05T08:54:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1605"},"modified":"2024-08-05T08:54:29","modified_gmt":"2024-08-05T08:54:29","slug":"yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-kesin-kanaat-icermeyen-rapor-12","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2024\/08\/05\/yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-kesin-kanaat-icermeyen-rapor-12\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARI – ADL\u0130 BELGE \u0130NCELEME – Kesin Kanaat \u0130\u00e7ermeyen Rapor"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 23.01.2018 tarih, 2016\/27214 Esas ve 2018\/548 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; <\/strong><\/p>\n

Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu aleyhine bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yoluyla takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rnek 10 \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine bor\u00e7lunun yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak imza itiraz\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu, mahkemece, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 12.05.2016 tarihli kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermeyen rapor<\/strong> h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\"\u0130mza<\/p>\n

\u0130tiraza konu imza \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan incelemeye ili\u015fkin olarak Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi Adli Belge \u0130nceleme<\/strong> \u015eubesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 12.05.2016 tarihli raporda; ” \u0130nceleme konusu senet \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenen belgede … ad\u0131na at\u0131l\u0131 imza ile …’\u0131n polimorf mukayese imzalar\u0131 aras\u0131nda; tersim bi\u00e7imi, i\u015fleklik derecesi, al\u0131\u015fkanl\u0131klar, istif, e\u011fim, do\u011frultu, seyir, h\u0131z ve bask\u0131 derecesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygunluk ve benzerlikler saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu imzan\u0131n kuvvetle muhtemel …’\u0131n eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fu”nun bildirildi\u011fi, bor\u00e7lunun 02\/06\/2016 tarihli duru\u015fmada bilirki\u015fi raporunu kabul etmedi\u011fini beyan ederek rapora itiraz etti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.Adli T\u0131p Kurumu’ndan al\u0131nan raporda, imzan\u0131n bor\u00e7lu …’\u0131n eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda net bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\"Kriminal<\/p>\n

Mahkemece, bahsi ge\u00e7en rapor h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmak suretiyle itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de, Adli T\u0131p Kurumundan al\u0131nan raporun bu hali ile kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaya elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu gibi, s\u00f6z konusu raporun an\u0131lan kurumdan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve heyet\u00e7e d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131, yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ona \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck sa\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, kesin kanaat bildirmeyen mevcut rapor esas al\u0131narak sonuca gidilemez. \u00d6te yandan, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi’nin imza incelemesinde son mercii olarak kabul\u00fc hususunda yasal bir d\u00fczenleme de bulunmamaktad\u0131r<\/strong> (HGK.’nun 07.10.2009 tarih ve 2009\/12-282 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131).<\/p>\n

O halde, mahkemece adli belge inceleme – grafoloji<\/strong> dal\u0131nda uzman bilirki\u015filerden olu\u015fturulacak yeni bir kuruldan kesin kanaat i\u00e7eren rapor <\/strong>ald\u0131r\u0131larak, sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermeyen ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm getirecek nitelikte bulunmayan rapor h\u00fckme esas al\u0131n\u0131p imzaya itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7 olarak; Mahkemece kesin kanaat bildirmeyen bir raporun, imzaya y\u00f6nelik itiraza cevap veremeyece\u011fi ve bu nedenle mahkemece dikkate al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131ca, adli belge inceleme – grafoloji<\/strong> alan\u0131nda uzman bilirki\u015filerden yeni bir rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fi vurgulanmak suretiyle bozma karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 23.01.2018 tarih, 2016\/27214 Esas ve 2018\/548 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu aleyhine bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yoluyla takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rnek 10 \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine bor\u00e7lunun yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak imza itiraz\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu, mahkemece, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 12.05.2016 tarihli kesin kanaat…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1606,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1605","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1605"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1605"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1605\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1607,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1605\/revisions\/1607"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1606"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}