{"id":1556,"date":"2024-06-29T16:26:17","date_gmt":"2024-06-29T16:26:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1556"},"modified":"2024-06-29T16:26:17","modified_gmt":"2024-06-29T16:26:17","slug":"yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-kesin-kanaat-icermeyen-rapor-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2024\/06\/29\/yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-kesin-kanaat-icermeyen-rapor-9\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARI &#8211; ADL\u0130 BELGE \u0130NCELEME &#8211; Kesin Kanaat \u0130\u00e7ermeyen Rapor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 19.04.2018 tarih, 2016\/30109 Esas ve 2018\/3377 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bor\u00e7lu vekilinin, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n 27.6.2016 tarihinde tefhim edilmesi \u00fczerine, mahkemeye 28.6.2016 tarihinde s\u00fcre tutum talepli temyiz dilek\u00e7esi sundu\u011fu, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi ile beraber temyiz har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ise yat\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunlar\u0131 bilahare 12.7.2016 tarihinde yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 25.01.1985 tarih ve 1984\/5 E.-1985\/1 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; harca t\u00e2bi olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n har\u00e7 al\u0131nmadan temyiz defterine kaydedilen temyiz dilek\u00e7esi hakk\u0131nda, HUMK\u2019nun 2494 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile de\u011fi\u015fik 434\/3. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen &#8220;eksik har\u00e7 ve gider \u00f6denmesi halinde yap\u0131lacak i\u015flemlerde ilgili kural&#8221; benzetme yoluyla uygulan\u0131r. Bu durumda temyiz iste\u011fi, dilek\u00e7enin temyiz defterine kaydedildi\u011fi tarihte yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Ancak, temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n mahkeme kalemince hesaplan\u0131p, temyiz edenden istendi\u011fi halde, s\u00fcresinde \u00f6denmedi\u011fi belgelendirilmi\u015f ise temyiz iste\u011finin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lan temyiz istemi \u00fczerine, bor\u00e7lu vekiline temyiz har\u00e7 ve giderlerinin \u00f6denmesi i\u00e7in kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7eren muht\u0131ra tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi, muht\u0131ra tebli\u011f edilmeden bor\u00e7lu vekilinin temyiz har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasa h\u00fckm\u00fcne uygun olarak muht\u0131ra g\u00f6nderilmeden temyiz har\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00f6dendi\u011finden, temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde yat\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek temyiz ba\u015fvurusunun reddine ili\u015fkin mahkemenin 21.8.2016 tarih ve 2015\/228 E.-2016\/181 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar\u0131nda isabet bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ek karar\u0131n oybirli\u011fiyle kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilerek bor\u00e7lunun esasa ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine ge\u00e7ildi;<\/p>\n<p>Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu aleyhine bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yoluyla takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rnek 10 \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine bor\u00e7lunun yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak <strong>imza itiraz\u0131nda<\/strong> bulundu\u011fu, mahkemece, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme <\/strong>\u015eubesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 08.3.2016 tarihli <strong>kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermeyen rapor<\/strong> h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130tiraza konu imza \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan incelemeye ili\u015fkin olarak Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme<\/strong> \u015eubesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 08.3.2016 tarihli raporda; &#8221; \u0130nceleme konusu <strong>senet<\/strong> \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f belgede A. Z.&#8217;ye atfen sol \u00fcst tarafa at\u0131l\u0131 imza ile A. Z.&#8217;n\u00fcn mukayese imzalar\u0131 aras\u0131nda; <strong>tersim bi\u00e7imi, i\u015fleklik derecesi, al\u0131\u015fkanl\u0131klar, istif, e\u011fim, do\u011frultu, seyir, h\u0131z ve bask\u0131 derecesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygunluk ve benzerlikler saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu imzan\u0131n kuvvetle muhtemel<\/strong> A. Z.&#8217;n\u00fcn eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fu&#8221;nun bildirildi\u011fi, bor\u00e7lunun 04.4.2016 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile <strong>bilirki\u015fi raporu<\/strong>nu kabul etmedi\u011fini beyan ederek rapora itiraz\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu ve yeni bir rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme<\/strong> \u015eubesinden al\u0131nan raporda, imzan\u0131n bor\u00e7lu &#8230;&#8217;\u00fcn eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda net bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1284\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/imza-inceleme-300x238.gif\" alt=\"\u0130mza inceleme bilimi Kriminal imza incelemesi Kriminal yaz\u0131 incelemesi nas\u0131l yap\u0131l\u0131r Grafoloji imza incelemesi\" width=\"300\" height=\"238\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, bahsi ge\u00e7en <strong>rapor<\/strong> h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmak suretiyle itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme<\/strong> \u015eubesinden al\u0131nan raporun kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaya elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu gibi, s\u00f6z konusu raporun an\u0131lan kurumdan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve heyet\u00e7e d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131, yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ona \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck sa\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, kesin kanaat bildirmeyen mevcut rapor esas al\u0131narak sonuca gidilemez. \u00d6te yandan, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme \u015eubesi<\/strong>\u2019nin <strong>imza incelemesinde son mercii olarak kabul\u00fc hususunda yasal bir d\u00fczenleme de bulunmamaktad\u0131r<\/strong> (HGK.&#8217;nun 07.10.2009 tarih ve 2009\/12-282 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131).<\/p>\n<p>O halde, mahkemece, <strong>adli belge inceleme \/ grafoloji dal\u0131nda uzman<\/strong> bilirki\u015filerden olu\u015fturulacak yeni bir kuruldan kesin kanaat i\u00e7eren rapor ald\u0131r\u0131larak, sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermeyen ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm getirecek nitelikte bulunmayan rapor h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1274\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Kriminalistik-1-300x219.jpg\" alt=\"Adli T\u0131p imza incelemesi Savc\u0131l\u0131k imza incelemesi \u0130mza inceleme bilimi Adli T\u0131p imza incelemesi \u00fccreti\" width=\"300\" height=\"219\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Kriminalistik-1-300x219.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Kriminalistik-1.jpg 386w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak; Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme<\/strong> \u015eubesi raporu kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi, bu nedenle, bu rapor h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaya elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na g\u00f6re, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme<\/strong> \u015eubesi raporu, heyet\u00e7e d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olsa bile, \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi, gelinen a\u015famada kesin kanaat i\u00e7eren rapor, <strong>adli belge inceleme \/ grafoloji dal\u0131nda uzman bilirki\u015filer<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 suretiyle olu\u015facak kanaate g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 19.04.2018 tarih, 2016\/30109 Esas ve 2018\/3377 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Bor\u00e7lu vekilinin, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n 27.6.2016 tarihinde tefhim edilmesi \u00fczerine, mahkemeye 28.6.2016 tarihinde s\u00fcre tutum talepli temyiz dilek\u00e7esi sundu\u011fu, temyiz dilek\u00e7esi ile beraber temyiz har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ise yat\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunlar\u0131 bilahare 12.7.2016 tarihinde yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 25.01.1985 tarih ve&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1557,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1556"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1556"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1556\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1558,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1556\/revisions\/1558"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}