{"id":1538,"date":"2024-04-23T20:21:11","date_gmt":"2024-04-23T20:21:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1538"},"modified":"2024-04-23T20:21:11","modified_gmt":"2024-04-23T20:21:11","slug":"yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-kesin-kanaat-icermeyen-rapor-8","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2024\/04\/23\/yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-kesin-kanaat-icermeyen-rapor-8\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARI &#8211; ADL\u0130 BELGE \u0130NCELEME &#8211; Kesin Kanaat \u0130\u00e7ermeyen Rapor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan 25.12.2017 tarihinde verilen 2016\/26001 Esas ve 2017\/16145 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lular aleyhine bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yolu ile ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibinde; bor\u00e7lular\u0131n, \u00f6rnek (10) numaral\u0131 \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 168\/4. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yasal s\u00fcrede icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak imzaya itiraz ettikleri, mahkemece, 11.05.2016 tarihli kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermeyen Adli T\u0131p Kurumu raporu h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak, bor\u00e7lular\u0131n imzaya itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda, takip konusu bonodaki imza \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme <strong>grafoloji ve sahtecilik uzman\u0131 <\/strong>bilirki\u015fiye yapt\u0131r\u0131lan inceleme olup, 07.09.2015 tarihli s\u00f6z konusu uzmanl\u0131k raporunda, bor\u00e7lu &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden imzan\u0131n bor\u00e7lu eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fu, di\u011fer bor\u00e7lu &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise imzan\u0131n bor\u00e7lu eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fctalaa edilmi\u015f, bilirki\u015fi raporuna taraflarca itiraz edilerek yeniden <strong>bilirki\u015fi incelemesi<\/strong> yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n talep edilmesi \u00fczerine, mahkemece, <strong>Adli T\u0131p Kurumu<\/strong> Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme <\/strong>\u015eubesi\u2019nden al\u0131nan 11.05.2016 tarihli <strong>raporda<\/strong>; imzalar\u0131n <strong>kuvvetle muhtemel<\/strong> &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;nun eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fu bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1200\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Imza-Incelemesi-\u2014-Sahte-Imza-Kontrolu-300x150.gif\" alt=\"Kriminal imza incelemesi Grafoloji imza incelemesi Kriminal imza incelemesi Ne kadar S\u00fcrer Hakimin imza incelemesi Senette imza incelemesi Adli T\u0131p imza incelemesi ne kadar s\u00fcrer Savc\u0131l\u0131k imza incelemesi Adli T\u0131p imza incelemesi itiraz\" width=\"300\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Imza-Incelemesi-\u2014-Sahte-Imza-Kontrolu-300x150.gif 300w, https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Imza-Incelemesi-\u2014-Sahte-Imza-Kontrolu-768x384.gif 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Her ne kadar mahkemece, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme <\/strong>\u015eubesi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan 11.05.2016 tarihli <strong>kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermeyen rapor<\/strong> h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de, s\u00f6z konusu raporun an\u0131lan kurumdan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve heyet\u00e7e d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131, yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ona \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck sa\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, <strong>imzan\u0131n aidiyeti konusunda net bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmeyen rapora g\u00f6re sonuca gidilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/strong> Zira, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme <\/strong>\u015eubesi <strong>imza incelemesinde son mercii olarak kabul\u00fc hususunda yasal bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmamaktad\u0131r<\/strong> (HGK.&#8217;nun 07.10.2009 tarih ve 2009\/12-282 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131). Ayr\u0131ca, mahkemece al\u0131nan ilk <strong>bilirki\u015fi raporu<\/strong>ndaki tespit bor\u00e7lu &#8230; lehine, bundan sonra al\u0131nan Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme <\/strong>\u015eubesi raporundaki tespit ise alacakl\u0131 lehine olup, resmi kurumlar\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine al\u0131nan ve birinin di\u011ferine \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kabul edilemeyen iki rapor aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fkinin olu\u015ftu\u011fu da g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>O halde, mahkemece, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan ve Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi <strong>Adli Belge \u0130nceleme <\/strong>\u015eubesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporda; imzalar\u0131n bor\u00e7lular &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;nun eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin <strong>kesin kanaat bildirilmedi\u011fi<\/strong> gibi, yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, <strong>raporlar aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fkinin de giderilmesi i\u00e7in yeniden ehil bilirki\u015filerden olu\u015facak bir kuruldan ku\u015fkudan uzak, Yarg\u0131tay denetimine ve h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaya elveri\u015fli rapor al\u0131narak<\/strong>, sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir denildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1280\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/grafoloji-imza-inceleme-300x277.jpg\" alt=\"Kriminal imza incelemesi Senette imza incelemesi Kriminal imza incelemesi Ne kadar S\u00fcrer Mahkemede imza incelemesi\" width=\"300\" height=\"277\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/grafoloji-imza-inceleme-300x277.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/grafoloji-imza-inceleme.jpg 389w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak; Mahkemece h\u00fck\u00fcm verilen dosyada Adli T\u0131p Kurumu raporu kesin kanaat i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi, daha \u00f6nce al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporuyla Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi Adli Belge \u0130nceleme \u015eubesi raporu aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulundu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca Adli T\u0131p Kurumu raporlar\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6zel bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131ndan \u00fcst\u00fcn oldu\u011fu yasal bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle bozma karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan 25.12.2017 tarihinde verilen 2016\/26001 Esas ve 2017\/16145 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lular aleyhine bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yolu ile ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibinde; bor\u00e7lular\u0131n, \u00f6rnek (10) numaral\u0131 \u00f6deme emrinin tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine \u0130\u0130K&#8217;nun 168\/4. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yasal s\u00fcrede icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurarak imzaya itiraz ettikleri, mahkemece, 11.05.2016 tarihli kesin&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1539,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1538"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1538"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1538\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1540,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1538\/revisions\/1540"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1539"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}