{"id":1446,"date":"2024-02-21T18:54:32","date_gmt":"2024-02-21T18:54:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1446"},"modified":"2024-02-21T18:54:32","modified_gmt":"2024-02-21T18:54:32","slug":"yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-tahrifat-eksik-inceleme-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2024\/02\/21\/yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-tahrifat-eksik-inceleme-2\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARI – ADL\u0130 BELGE \u0130NCELEME – Tahrifat – Eksik \u0130nceleme"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay 21. Hukuk Dairesi 09.12.2010 tarih, 2009\/16133 Esas ve 2010\/12278 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; <\/strong><\/p>\n

Davac\u0131, oda kayd\u0131n\u0131n usuls\u00fcz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle … hizmetinin ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin Kurum i\u015fleminin iptalini, daval\u0131- kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 Kurumda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilams\u0131z icra takibine daval\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n iptalini istemi\u015flerdir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, davac\u0131n\u0131n 22\/03\/1985 \u2013 29\/03\/2000 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki Sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 emeklilik i\u015fleminin iptaline ili\u015fkin 14\/08\/2001 tarih ve 9231say\u0131l\u0131 daval\u0131 Kurum ( … ) i\u015fleminin iptaline ,birle\u015fen 2002\/313 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosya y\u00f6n\u00fcnden,davan\u0131n reddine ,karar verilmi\u015ftir. 01.04.1972 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, 1479 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 24. maddesi ilk \u015fekliyle, sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n olu\u015fumu i\u00e7in, kendi ad ve hesab\u0131na ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma olgusunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi yan\u0131nda, ayr\u0131ca, kanunla kurulu meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olma ko\u015fulunu da aram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kurulu\u015flara kay\u0131t tarihi ise, sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, yasal karine kabul edilmi\u015ftir. 04.05.1979 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 2229 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa, …\u2019lu olabilme y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, s\u00f6z konusu 24. maddenin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olma ko\u015fulunu kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015f, sadece yasan\u0131n temel ilkesi olan kendi ad ve hesab\u0131na \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fulunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi durumunda, sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n olu\u015faca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yeterli g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n, 20.04.1982 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 2654 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n sigortal\u0131 olabilmeleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden vergi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f, vergiden muaf olanlar\u0131n da kanunla kurulu meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olmalar\u0131 durumunda yine sigortal\u0131 say\u0131lacaklar\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir. Nihayet, 22.03.1985 y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck tarihli 3165 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa, sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011fa karine y\u00f6n\u00fcnden vergi kayd\u0131n\u0131n, bu kayd\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 veya vergiden muaf olunmas\u0131 halinde, esnaf ve sanatkar sicili veya kanunla kurulu meslek kurulu\u015fu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Dosyadaki kay\u0131t ve belgelerden, davac\u0131n\u0131n 02.12.1999 tarihli giri\u015f bildirgesi ile 29.09.1979 tarih ve 232 s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 ile Bismil esnaf ve Sanatkarlar Odas\u0131ndaki \u00fcye kayd\u0131na istinaden 22.03.1985 tarihi itibariyle 1479 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa kapsam\u0131nda zorunlu … sigortal\u0131s\u0131 olarak tescil edildi\u011fi, tescilinin 29.03.2000 tahsis talep tarihine kadar devam etti\u011fi,29.03.2000 tarihinde tahsis talebinde bulundu\u011fu,01.04.2000 tarihinde ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, Kurumca, 14.08.2001 tarih ve 9231 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131yla,Bismil Esnaf Odas\u0131 kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcfetti\u015f raporuyla usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu tesbit edildi\u011finden … hizmet s\u00fcrelerinin ve ba\u011flanan ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iptal edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131ya yersiz \u00f6denen ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle 1.011.310.083 TL as\u0131l ve 492.674.784 TL faiz olmak \u00fczere toplam 1.503.984.867 TL’ nin \u00f6denmesi i\u00e7in ilams\u0131z icra takibi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n borca itiraz etti\u011fi, Kurumca itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Bismil Esnaf Odas\u0131na 29.09.1979 tarihinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011funun g\u00f6z\u00fckt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kayd\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi, Odaca eski kay\u0131t defterinin sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,1997 tarihli kay\u0131t defterinin sunuldu\u011fu,1997 tarihli kay\u0131t defterinin geli\u015fig\u00fczel tutuldu\u011fu, imzalar\u0131n eksik at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, karar defterinin,1996 y\u0131l\u0131 \u00f6ncesine dair haz\u0131run cetvellerinin, aidat \u00f6demeye dair makbuzlar\u0131n sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 24.02.2000 tarihli 279 say\u0131l\u0131 Kurum Genelgesi uyar\u0131nca mahallinde d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta; davac\u0131n\u0131n Bismil Noterli\u011finin 20.08.1997 tarih ve 5447 yevmiye numaras\u0131 ile noter tasdikli \u00dcye Kay\u0131t Defterinin 59. sayfas\u0131nda 232 sicil numaras\u0131 ile 29.09.1979 tarihinde kaydoldu\u011funun, terkine rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcr Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131, \u015eef ve Memurdan olu\u015fan 3 ki\u015filik kurul taraf\u0131ndan tesbit edildi\u011fi, vergi ve esnaf sicil kayd\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 27.04.2001 tarihli m\u00fcfetti\u015f raporunda, davac\u0131ya ili\u015fkin b\u00f6l\u00fcmde; … ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen giri\u015f bildirgesinin 02.12.1999 tarih ve 39390 say\u0131 ile kurum kay\u0131tlar\u0131na girmesi \u00fczerine ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin Bismil Esnaf ve Sanatkarlar Odas\u0131ndaki Kayd\u0131na istinaden …\u2019a kay\u0131t ve tescil edildi\u011fi, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin 232 sicil numaras\u0131 ile 29.09.1979 tarihinden beri kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, esnaf sicil kayd\u0131 ile vergi kayd\u0131na rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, beyan\u0131 al\u0131nan e\u015finin …’\u0131n 1979 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri terzilik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi halde giri\u015f bildirgesinde mesle\u011finin tuzcu olarak g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fe y\u00f6nelik olarak …\u2019a tabi sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Bismil Esnaf ve Sanatkarlar Odas\u0131na yap\u0131lan kayd\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu ve bu nedenle davac\u0131n\u0131n 22.03.1985-29.03.2000 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki …\u2019a tabi hizmet s\u00fcrelerinin iptal edilerek kendisine verilen ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca Bismil Esnaf Odas\u0131 \u00fcye kay\u0131t defterinin 1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda yeni deftere kay\u0131t edildi\u011fi, eski \u00fcye kay\u0131t defterinin ak\u0131betinin bilinmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile m\u00fcfetti\u015fli\u011fe ibraz edilmedi\u011fi, sonradan yap\u0131lan kayd\u0131n usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, bu kay\u0131tlar s\u0131ras\u0131nda odayla ilgileri bulunmayan ki\u015filerin kayd\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131larak … dan haks\u0131z yere hizmet s\u00fcresi kazand\u0131rman\u0131n ama\u00e7 edinildi\u011fi, bunun ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in odan\u0131n eski \u00fcye kay\u0131t defterleri ve y\u00f6netim kurulu karar defterlerinin ibraz edilmedi\u011fi bahse konu \u00fcye kay\u0131t defterlerinin geli\u015fig\u00fczel yeni deftere kay\u0131t edildi\u011fi , defterde \u00fcyelikle ilgili bilgiler ve imzalar\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, eski defterlerin ibraz edilmemesi nedeni ile bu defterlerin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi konusunda teredd\u00fctler olu\u015ftu\u011fu , 1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda yeni defterdeki kay\u0131tlara g\u00f6re …\u2019a kay\u0131t ve tescili yap\u0131lan ve ba\u015fka bir yerde kayd\u0131 bulunmayan ki\u015filerden bilgisine ba\u015fvurulmak \u00fczere gelenlerin genellikle zahirecilik ve seyyar sat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k gibi mesleklerle u\u011fra\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ancak buna ili\u015fkin belge ibraz edemedikleri, odaya aidat \u00f6demediklerini ve se\u00e7imlerde oy kullanmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan ettikleri, oda kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok eski tarihlerde ba\u015flamas\u0131na ve sadece oda kayd\u0131 oldu\u011fu halde vergi m\u00fckellefiyeti ve esnaf sicil kayd\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 nas\u0131l devam ettirdiklerini ve …\u2019a neden 1998-1999 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015fvurduklar\u0131 konusunda inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ,incelemeye konu ki\u015filerin 1984 y\u0131l\u0131ndan \u00f6ncesine ili\u015fkin hazirun cetvellerinin temin edilemedi\u011fini , \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce kay\u0131tlar\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011fu ile ilgili yap\u0131lan tetkiklerinde oda ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca eski defter ve belgeler ibraz edilemedi\u011fi i\u00e7in sonradan d\u00fczenlenen defterdeki bilgilere itibar edilerek tutanak tutuldu\u011fu bu nedenlerle davac\u0131n\u0131n sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131larak, ayl\u0131k ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131n ayl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesi gerekti\u011finin bildirildi\u011fi, Bismil Esnaf Odas\u0131 y\u00f6neticileri ve \u00fcyelerinden olu\u015fan 59 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda resmi evrakta sahtekarl\u0131k suretiyle Kamu Kurulu\u015funu doland\u0131rmak su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan Diyarbak\u0131r 3.A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davan\u0131n derdest oldu\u011fu, \u0130ddianamede, eski \u00fcye kay\u0131t defterinin ibraz edilemedi\u011fi, mevcut \u00fcye kay\u0131t defterinin d\u00fczenli tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, oda ile ilgisi bulunmayan ki\u015filerin odaya kayd\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131larak … dan haks\u0131z ayl\u0131k almalar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda da resmi evrakta sahtecilik yap\u0131larak kamu kurumunu doland\u0131rmakla su\u00e7lanmas\u0131yla dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Diyarbak\u0131r 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2003\/65 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda Bismil Esnaf ve Sanatkarlar Odas\u0131 \u00fcye kay\u0131t defterleri \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan Kriminal \u0130nceleme raporunun 5. sayfas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n Bismil Noterli\u011fince 20.08.1997 tarih ve 05447 yevmiye numaras\u0131 ile tasdiklenmi\u015f \u00fcye kay\u0131t defterinin 59. sayfas\u0131nda 224 ve 232. s\u0131ra numaralar\u0131nda kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, Kriminal raporun 9. sayfas\u0131nda; bu kayd\u0131n dok\u00fcman inceleme cihaz\u0131 ile yap\u0131lan incelemeleri neticesinde belirtilen kay\u0131t \u00fczerinde tahrifat<\/strong> ama\u00e7l\u0131 olarak silinti-kaz\u0131nt\u0131 veya ilave yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/strong> g\u00f6sterir nitelikte yeterli bulgulara rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong> \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131n\u0131n 22.03.1985-29.03.2000 tarihleri aras\u0131nda usul\u00fcne uygun (ge\u00e7erli) bir oda kayd\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle bu d\u00f6nemde sigortal\u0131l\u0131k \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n

Ancak daval\u0131 Kurum\u2019un ge\u00e7mi\u015fe y\u00f6nelik (uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu d\u00f6nemi de kapsar \u015fekilde) prim tahsil etmesi ve uzun s\u00fcre bu primleri kullanmas\u0131 sigortal\u0131ya ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flay\u0131p ayl\u0131k konusunda umut verdikten sonra davac\u0131n\u0131n sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iptal etmesi Medeni Kanun\u2019un 2. maddesinde ifadesini bulan objektif iyi niyet kurallar\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmayacakt\u0131r. Nitekim, Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 01.10.1997 g\u00fcn ve E: 1997\/10-578, K: 1997\/758; 24.09.2003 g\u00fcn ve 2003\/10-489, 2003\/490 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 da bu do\u011frultudad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ne var ki; kimse kendi hilesinden istifade edemeyece\u011finden bu kural\u0131n uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in usuls\u00fcz oda kayd\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131nda kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu mavazaal\u0131 bir i\u015flem sonucu olu\u015fturulmamas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131n\u0131n 1479 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’ya tabi zorunlu … sigortal\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan Bismil Esnaf Odas\u0131 kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n sahtecilik suretiyle olu\u015fturuldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla, oda y\u00f6neticileri , \u00fcyeleri ve davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131, oda kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n sahtecilik suretiyle olu\u015fturulup olu\u015fturulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, olu\u015fturulmu\u015f ise bu sahtecilik i\u015fleminin davac\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilip ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmedi\u011fi bu dava sonucu verilecek karar ile saptanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, oda kayd\u0131n\u0131n sahtecilik yoluyla olu\u015fturuldu\u011fu ve bu i\u015flemin davac\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde oda kayd\u0131na hukuken di\u011fer verilemeyece\u011fi bu durumda somut olaya MK 2. maddesi uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n sonucu beklenilerek t\u00fcm delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve bir sonuca var\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, mahkemece ceza davas\u0131n\u0131n sonucu beklenmeden eksik inceleme ile tan\u0131k s\u00f6zleri ile yetinilerek sonuca gidilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozma nedenidir. O halde, daval\u0131- kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 Kurumun bu y\u00f6nleri ama\u00e7layan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 kabul edilmeli,<\/p>\n

\"Kriminal<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7 olarak; Mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n sahtecilik<\/strong> iddias\u0131n\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rmadan ve ceza davas\u0131n\u0131n sonucunu beklemeden karar verdi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n sahtecilik<\/strong> iddias\u0131n\u0131 sadece tan\u0131k s\u00f6zleri ile de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n sahtecilik<\/strong> iddias\u0131n\u0131 1479 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ve sair mevzuat \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fi, mahkemenin eksik inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurdu\u011funu ve bu nedenle karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n bozma karar\u0131, mahkemelerin davac\u0131lar\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131 dikkatli bir \u015fekilde ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 ve her t\u00fcrl\u00fc delili de\u011ferlendirmesi gerekti\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay 21. Hukuk Dairesi 09.12.2010 tarih, 2009\/16133 Esas ve 2010\/12278 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Davac\u0131, oda kayd\u0131n\u0131n usuls\u00fcz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle … hizmetinin ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin Kurum i\u015fleminin iptalini, daval\u0131- kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 Kurumda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilams\u0131z icra takibine daval\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n iptalini istemi\u015flerdir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, davac\u0131n\u0131n 22\/03\/1985 \u2013 29\/03\/2000 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1447,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1446","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1446"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1446"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1446\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1448,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1446\/revisions\/1448"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1447"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}