{"id":1411,"date":"2024-02-10T08:14:26","date_gmt":"2024-02-10T08:14:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1411"},"modified":"2024-02-10T08:14:26","modified_gmt":"2024-02-10T08:14:26","slug":"yagritay-karari-uzman-gorusu-celiskili-rapor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2024\/02\/10\/yagritay-karari-uzman-gorusu-celiskili-rapor\/","title":{"rendered":"YAGRITAY KARARI – UZMAN G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc – \u00c7eli\u015fkili Rapor"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 05.03.2015 tarih, 2014\/5201 Esas ve 2015\/2984 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle;<\/strong><\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkili ile daval\u0131 banka aras\u0131nda 04.09.2009 tarihinde T\u00fcrev \u00dcr\u00fcnler \u00c7er\u00e7eve S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda yat\u0131r\u0131m ama\u00e7l\u0131 olarak” vadeli d\u00f6viz al\u0131m sat\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi” i\u015flemleri yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin yat\u0131r\u0131m konusunda tecr\u00fcbeli oldu\u011funu ve yat\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 \u015fahsen takip etti\u011fini ve m\u00fcvekkilinin i\u015flemlerde \u0131slak imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n 19.01.2010 tarihli vadeli d\u00f6viz al\u0131m i\u015flemlerini m\u00fcvekkilinin r\u0131zas\u0131 olmadan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n adet fiyat\u0131 1.4365 USD olan toplam 1.795.625 USD olan 10 adet kontrat, fiyat\u0131 1.4391 USD olan 1.798.875 USD’lik 10 adet kontrat, kontrat b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 1.792.125 USD’den adet fiyat\u0131 1.4337 USD’den 1.792.125 USD’lik 10 adet kontrat ve 1.4310 USD birimden 1.788.750 USD olan 10 adet kontrat al\u0131m\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kontratlar\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 ve bitim tarihlerindeki fark olan 181.000 USD zarar\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fini ve m\u00fcvekkilinin i\u015flemler nedeniyle zarar etti\u011fini, i\u015flemlerden \u015eube Y\u00f6netmeni …’nun ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat :16’dan sonra aramas\u0131 \u00fczerine haberdar oldu\u011funu ve banka \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131na s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemleri kabul etmedi\u011fini bildirdi\u011fini, pe\u015fi s\u0131ra daval\u0131 bankada \u00e7e\u015fitli unvanlarda g\u00f6rev yapan yetkililerle bir\u00e7ok kez g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve kendisine zarar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n taahh\u00fct edildi\u011fini, ancak herhangi bir geli\u015fme olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, konu ile ilgili olarak daval\u0131 banka Tefti\u015f Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’nca soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve haz\u0131rlanan rapor gere\u011fince Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck hazine \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 ile …. \u015eubesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n istifaya zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek \u015fimdilik 181.000 USD zarar\u0131n 19.01.2010 tarihinden fiili \u00f6deme tarihine kadar hesap edilecek yasal (Kamu bankalar\u0131nca USD cinsi mevduata verilen en y\u00fcksek faiz oran\u0131 \u00fczerinden talep edilecek) faizi ile birlikte, fiili \u00f6deme tarihindeki … kurundan TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkili banka ile davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda 12.12.2008 tarihli T\u00fcrev \u00dcr\u00fcnler \u00c7er\u00e7eve S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 olarak Futures \u0130\u015flemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 19.01.2010 i\u015flem tarihli 4 adet futures kontrat\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in bankaya talimat verdi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flemleri talimata uygun olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirerek m\u00fc\u015fteri hesab\u0131na yans\u0131tt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015flemin daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slak imzal\u0131 talimat\u0131 neticesinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir an i\u00e7in davac\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru oldu\u011fu kabul edilse bile davac\u0131n\u0131n sonradan att\u0131\u011f\u0131 imza ile dava konusu i\u015flemi kabul etmi\u015f oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan dava dilek\u00e7esine ek olarak sunulmu\u015f toplant\u0131 tutana\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131n\u0131n delil olarak kabul edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 ad\u0131na yap\u0131lan Futures i\u015flemlerinde hatal\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle herhangi bir banka \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdinin feshedilmedi\u011fini savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece, iddia, savunma, bilirki\u015fi raporu ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re dava konusu i\u015flem \u00f6ncesi banka davac\u0131dan T\u00fcrev \u0130\u015flem Prosed\u00fcr\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde onay alm\u0131\u015f olsayd\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnme pay\u0131 ve s\u00fcresi olaca\u011f\u0131ndan takdiren y\u00fczde elli ihtimalle onaylayabilece\u011fini, bu durumun daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n kusur oran\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fczde elliye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, di\u011fer yandan davac\u0131n\u0131n daha \u00f6nceki kar elde etti\u011fi benzer i\u015flemlerde talimats\u0131z i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kabul ederek i\u015flemi sonradan imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131, onaylad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu durumun istikrar kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi ile davac\u0131n\u0131n talimat al\u0131nmadan yap\u0131lan karl\u0131 i\u015flemlere ortak oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, talimat al\u0131nmadan yap\u0131lan zarar do\u011furan i\u015flemlere de ortak olmas\u0131n\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olup, bu nedenle daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n kusur oran\u0131n\u0131n yar\u0131 oranda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclerek y\u00fczde 25’e indirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n tespit edilen %25 kusur oran\u0131na g\u00f6re sorumlu oldu\u011fu miktar\u0131n\u0131n 34.178,13 USD olarak hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131, gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile 34.178,13 USD’nin 19.04.2010 tarihinden itibaren devlet bankalar\u0131n\u0131n USD cinsinden mevduata uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 en y\u00fcksek faizi ile daval\u0131dan tahsiline, fazla talebin reddine, BK 83. ve 84. maddelerinin infazda de\u011ferlendirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili ve daval\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Dava, davac\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 olmadan, daval\u0131 banka \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, davac\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan Future i\u015flemleri nedeniyle, davac\u0131n\u0131n zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla bu zarar\u0131n tazminine y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucu daval\u0131 bankay\u0131 %25 oran\u0131nda kusurlu bulan bilirki\u015fi raporuna itibar edilerek ve bu rapordaki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n hakkaniyetli geldi\u011fi takdir olunup davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Vadeli \u0130\u015flem S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, belirli bir miktar, kalite ve ko\u015fullarla standartla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir mal\u0131n, menkul de\u011ferin, g\u00f6stergenin ya da yabanc\u0131 paran\u0131n, i\u015flem an\u0131nda o vadeli i\u015flem borsas\u0131nda piyasa g\u00fc\u00e7lerince belirlenen fiyattan, gelecekte belirli bir tarihte, yerde ve ko\u015fullarda teslim al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 ve teslim edilmesini i\u00e7eren yasal olarak ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmedir. Vadeli kontratlar taraflar\u0131n gelecekte belirli bir tarihte belirli bir miktar \u015feyi, teslim etme esas\u0131na dayan\u0131r. S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sat\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 belirli miktar \u015feyi belirli bir g\u00fcn \u00f6demeyi, al\u0131c\u0131 tarafta bu \u015feyi almay\u0131 taahh\u00fct eder. Ger\u00e7ek uygulamada son teslimat pek ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmez. Piyasan\u0131n likitidesine g\u00f6re s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler s\u00f6zle\u015fme sonu bitmeden iptal edilirler. Vadeli kontratlar\u0131n bir\u00e7ok uygulama alan\u0131 vard\u0131r. \u00dcr\u00fcnler veya mallar i\u00e7in (ke\u00e7i, k\u00fct\u00fck, pamuk vb.), d\u00f6viz i\u00e7in, faiz i\u015fleyen mevduatlar i\u00e7in ve alt\u0131n i\u00e7in vadeli kontrat yap\u0131labilir. Bir \u00e7ok vadeli kontrat i\u00e7inden en s\u0131k kullan\u0131lan ve piyasas\u0131 geli\u015fmi\u015f olan d\u00f6viz ve faiz vadeli kontratlar\u0131d\u0131r. D\u00f6viz Vadeli Kontratlar; bir d\u00f6viz vadeli kontrat\u0131, kur s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olup belli bir miktar d\u00f6vizi sabit bir zaman, yer ve fiyattan gelecek bir tarihteki teslimat\u0131 \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. S\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemler, \u00f6zel ve teknik bilgi ile y\u00fcksek deneyim gerektiren t\u00fcrev i\u015flemleridir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayatta s\u00f6z konusu t\u00fcrev i\u015flemlerinin orta ya da k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck s\u0131radan yat\u0131r\u0131mc\u0131lar de\u011fil, future i\u015flemlerini kar elde etmeyi ama\u00e7layan s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemlerin, risklerini bilen, daha b\u00fcy\u00fck yat\u0131r\u0131mc\u0131lar bu i\u015flemleri yapmaktad\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc t\u00fcrev i\u015flem piyasalar\u0131, son derece k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede olabilece\u011fi gibi, bu piyasalara yap\u0131lan yat\u0131r\u0131mlar m\u00fc\u015fteri i\u00e7in b\u00fcy\u00fck kazan\u00e7lar elde edilebilece\u011fi gibi, b\u00fcy\u00fck kay\u0131p riskleri de ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n da s\u00f6z konusu davaya konu olaydan \u00f6nce, daval\u0131 banka ile 2009 y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren future i\u015flemlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131 ile daval\u0131 aras\u0131nda imzalanm\u0131\u015f olan T\u00fcrev \u00dcr\u00fcnler \u00c7er\u00e7eve S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, daval\u0131 banka \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fterinin yaz\u0131l\u0131 izni olmaks\u0131z\u0131n future i\u015flemi yapmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, esas olan\u0131n taraflar\u0131n bizzat haz\u0131r olarak i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n esas oldu\u011fu, bununla birlikte s\u00f6zle\u015fme uyar\u0131nca m\u00fc\u015fteri taraf\u0131ndan belirtilen elektronik posta adresi ile yada faks suretiyle i\u015flem talimatlar\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131, yahut da s\u00f6zl\u00fc al\u0131nacak talimatlar\u0131n bankan\u0131n konu\u015fmalar\u0131 kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nan telefonla s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, opsiyon s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 onay\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

Dava konusu olayda, gerek banka tefti\u015f kurulunun denetim raporunda, gerekse taraflar\u0131n daha sonra dosyaya yans\u0131yan beyan ve dilek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 talimat\u0131n ya da telefon kayd\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra 26\/01\/2010 tarihinde davac\u0131n\u0131n icazetinin al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu, daval\u0131 banka ve banka \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n bilgisi ve talebi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n, davac\u0131 ad\u0131na future i\u015flemleri yaparak kusurlu oldu\u011fu ancak, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n 26\/01\/2010 tarihinde dava konusu i\u015flemlere ili\u015fkin talimat\u0131 imzalayarak i\u015flemlere icazet verilmesi nedeniyle, daval\u0131 bankadaki kusur ile zarar aras\u0131ndaki illiyet ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n onay\u0131 ile kesilip kesilmedi\u011fi, (ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn yap\u0131lan di\u011fer iki i\u015flemde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan elde edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclen kar\u0131n da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde davac\u0131ya ait oldu\u011fu) hususlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak u\u011fran\u0131lan zarardan bankan\u0131n sorumlu olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilip sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca, Yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren ve somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’n\u0131n 293. maddesinde, taraflar\u0131n, dava konusu olayla ilgili olarak uzman\u0131ndan bilimsel m\u00fctalaa alabilecekleri d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup hakimin bu delili serbest\u00e7e de\u011ferlendirebilece\u011fi ku\u015fkusuzdur. Bu itibarla, mahkemece al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 ile sunulan uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/strong> aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fki giderilerek ve gerekirse an\u0131lan maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen, hakimin rapor<\/strong> al\u0131nan uzman ki\u015fiyi davet ederek dinleyebilece\u011fi imkan\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek olu\u015facak sonu\u00e7 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde eksik incelemeye dayal\u0131 olarak h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi de do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenle de daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131na ve davac\u0131 vekilinin t\u00fcm temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\"uzman<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7 olarak; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’n\u0131n 293. maddesi, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan ve dava konusuna ili\u015fkin uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/strong> al\u0131nmas\u0131na imkan tan\u0131yan bir h\u00fck\u00fcmd\u00fcr. Hakim, bu delili serbest\u00e7e de\u011ferlendirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Davada, mahkemece al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 ile taraflarca sunulan uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda, mahkeme, hakimin rapor<\/strong> al\u0131nan uzman<\/strong> ki\u015fiyi dinleyebilece\u011fi maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 da dikkate alarak, \u00e7eli\u015fkiyi gidermek ve sonucu belirlemek zorundad\u0131r. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan inceleme eksik olup, h\u00fck\u00fcm bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle de daval\u0131 lehine bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 05.03.2015 tarih, 2014\/5201 Esas ve 2015\/2984 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkili ile daval\u0131 banka aras\u0131nda 04.09.2009 tarihinde T\u00fcrev \u00dcr\u00fcnler \u00c7er\u00e7eve S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda yat\u0131r\u0131m ama\u00e7l\u0131 olarak” vadeli d\u00f6viz al\u0131m sat\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi” i\u015flemleri yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin yat\u0131r\u0131m konusunda tecr\u00fcbeli oldu\u011funu ve yat\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 \u015fahsen takip etti\u011fini ve m\u00fcvekkilinin i\u015flemlerde…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1140,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1411"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1411"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1411\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1413,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1411\/revisions\/1413"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}