{"id":1381,"date":"2024-02-03T09:15:53","date_gmt":"2024-02-03T09:15:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1381"},"modified":"2024-02-03T09:15:53","modified_gmt":"2024-02-03T09:15:53","slug":"yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-kesin-kanaat-icermeyen-rapor-eksik-inceleme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2024\/02\/03\/yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-kesin-kanaat-icermeyen-rapor-eksik-inceleme\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARI – ADL\u0130 BELGE \u0130NCELEME – Kesin Kanaat \u0130\u00e7ermeyen Rapor – Eksik \u0130nceleme"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay 19. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 02.03.2015 tarih, 2014\/20535 Esas ve 2015\/2868 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; <\/strong><\/p>\n

As\u0131l davada davac\u0131…. \u0130n\u015faat Ltd. \u015eti. vekili, taraflar aras\u0131nda bir adet kamyonun 100.000,00 TL bedelle sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 konusunda bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin ara\u00e7 bedelini pe\u015fin olarak \u00f6dedi\u011fini ve arac\u0131 teslim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak arac\u0131n \u00fczerinde haciz bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle arac\u0131n devir ve tescil i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra daval\u0131n\u0131n arac\u0131 noter sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir \u015fahsa satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin ara\u00e7 bedeli olarak \u00f6dedi\u011fi 100.000,00 TL’yi de geri alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshi ile fazlaya dair haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla 100.000,00 TL’nin daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

As\u0131l davada daval\u0131 … Ltd. \u015eti. vekili, taraflar aras\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi gibi bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkiline 100.000,00 TL \u00f6deme yapmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilinin ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6deme yapmakta oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc etti\u011fi arac\u0131n da bu ara\u00e7lardan biri oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ticari ili\u015fki nedeniyle davac\u0131dan 47.781,10 TL alacakl\u0131 oldu\u011funu savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Birle\u015fen davada davac\u0131 …. Ltd. \u015eti. vekili, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ticari ili\u015fki nedeniyle m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131dan 47.781,10 TL cari hesap alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu, alaca\u011f\u0131n tahsili amac\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibinin daval\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z itiraz\u0131 ile durdu\u011funu belirterek itiraz\u0131n iptaline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Birle\u015fen davada daval\u0131 …. \u0130n\u015faat Ltd. \u015eti. vekili, taraflar aras\u0131nda 2006 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana nakliye hizmeti ile ilgili cari hesap ili\u015fkisi bulundu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu hizmet dolay\u0131s\u0131yla gerekli \u00f6demeleri davac\u0131ya yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak m\u00fcvekkilinin bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u00f6demeleri elden yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu \u00f6demelerin davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a k\u00f6t\u00fcniyetli olarak hesaba i\u015flenmedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n alacakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu kabul edilse bile m\u00fcvekkilinin davac\u0131dan olan 100.000,00 TL alaca\u011f\u0131ndan bu alaca\u011f\u0131n takas-mahsubunun yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fini savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece toplanan delillere g\u00f6re; \u00f6ncelikle sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi alt\u0131ndaki imzan\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firket yetkilisine ait olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde grafolojik inceleme yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, al\u0131nan ilk grafolojik raporda s\u00f6zle\u015fme alt\u0131ndaki imzan\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firket yetkilisi eli \u00fcr\u00fcn oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015fse de itiraz nedeniyle al\u0131nan Adli T\u0131p Kurumu \u0130htisas Dairesi Heyet Raporunda s\u00f6zle\u015fme alt\u0131ndaki imzan\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firket yetkilisi eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Grafoloji Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi – Adli Belge \u0130nceleme \u015fubesince verilen raporun dairenin ihtisas dairesi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkemece de yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, kald\u0131 ki taraflar aras\u0131nda var oldu\u011fu iddia olunan sat\u0131\u015fa veya \u00f6demeye ili\u015fkin kay\u0131tlar\u0131n taraf defterlerinde mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla as\u0131l davan\u0131n s\u00fcbuta ermedi\u011fi, birle\u015fen davaya konu alacakla ilgili olarak yap\u0131lan incelemede ise taraflar\u0131n lehe delil vasf\u0131n\u0131 haiz olmayan ticari defter kay\u0131tlar\u0131na g\u00f6re mevcut ticari ili\u015fki nedeniyle birle\u015fen dava davac\u0131s\u0131 … Ltd. \u015eti.’nin 47.781,10 TL alacakl\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla birle\u015fen dava daval\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n icra takibine itiraz\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle as\u0131l davan\u0131n reddine, birle\u015fen davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm as\u0131l dava davac\u0131s\u0131-birle\u015fen dava daval\u0131s\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece yapt\u0131r\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda grafoloji uzmanlar\u0131ndan olu\u015fan bilirki\u015fi heyetince d\u00fczenlenen 12.09.2011 tarihli raporda s\u00f6zle\u015fmedeki imzan\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firket yetkilisi eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fu bildirilmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz \u00fczerine Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi’nce d\u00fczenlenen 20.11.2013 tarihli raporda ise, s\u00f6z konusu imzan\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firket yetkilisi eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. B\u00f6ylece her iki bilirki\u015fi raporu aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015fmu\u015ftur. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi’nin imza incelemesinde son mercii olarak kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu rapora \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131narak sonuca gidilemez. Bu durumda, mahkemece yeniden olu\u015fturulacak grafoloji alan\u0131nda uzman 3 ki\u015filik bilirki\u015fi kurulundan rapor al\u0131narak iki rapor aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fki giderildikten sonra, sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde sonuca gidilmesi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n

\"Adli<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7 olarak; Davac\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kendisine ait olmayan imzalarla d\u00fczenlenen senetlere dayan\u0131larak haks\u0131z bir \u015fekilde icra takibine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, senetlerin sahte oldu\u011funun tespiti ve takibin iptali talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Raporu’nu delil olarak kabul ederek, raporda belirtilen imza kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131n kesin bir sonu\u00e7 vermedi\u011fi<\/strong> gerek\u00e7esiyle davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Ancak, bu karar hatal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc mahkemece davac\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek imzalar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan resmi belgelerin temin edilmesi ve bu belgelerle senetlerdeki imzalar\u0131n uzman bir bilirki\u015fi <\/strong>veya kurul taraf\u0131ndan yeniden incelenme yap\u0131larak sonuca karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle bozma karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay 19. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 02.03.2015 tarih, 2014\/20535 Esas ve 2015\/2868 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; As\u0131l davada davac\u0131…. \u0130n\u015faat Ltd. \u015eti. vekili, taraflar aras\u0131nda bir adet kamyonun 100.000,00 TL bedelle sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 konusunda bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin ara\u00e7 bedelini pe\u015fin olarak \u00f6dedi\u011fini ve arac\u0131 teslim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak arac\u0131n \u00fczerinde haciz bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle arac\u0131n devir ve tescil…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1382,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1381"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1381"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1383,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1381\/revisions\/1383"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1382"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}