{"id":1228,"date":"2023-12-14T21:29:11","date_gmt":"2023-12-14T21:29:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1228"},"modified":"2023-12-14T21:29:11","modified_gmt":"2023-12-14T21:29:11","slug":"yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-tahrifat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2023\/12\/14\/yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-tahrifat\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARI &#8211; ADL\u0130 BELGE \u0130NCELEME &#8211; Tahrifat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 19.09.2018 tarih 2018\/11872 Esas ve\u00a0 2018\/8370 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7eke dayal\u0131 olarak <strong>kambiyo<\/strong> senetlerine \u00f6zg\u00fc haciz yolu ile ba\u015flat\u0131lan takipte; bor\u00e7lunun sair itirazlar\u0131 ile birlikte, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 <strong>\u00e7ekte<\/strong> <strong>tahrifat<\/strong> yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ke\u015fide tarihinin defalarca de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini ve at\u0131lan paraf imzalar\u0131n\u0131n kime ait oldu\u011funun belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahrifattan \u00f6nceki haliyle \u00e7ekin ibraz s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7mi\u015f oldu\u011funu belirterek takibin iptaline karar verilmesini talep etti\u011fi, davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda, yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi gibi bor\u00e7lunun ke\u015fide tarihi \u00fczerinde defalarca tahrifat kabul edilebilecek \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan bu de\u011fi\u015fikler ile at\u0131lan paraf imzalar\u0131n kime ait oldu\u011funun belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve an\u0131lan tahrifat \u00f6ncesi ke\u015fide tarihine g\u00f6re an\u0131lan \u00e7ekin ibraz\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde kabul edilemeyece\u011fine dair itirazlar\u0131 mevcut olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen mahkemece, ke\u015fide tarihinde mevcut paraf imzalar ile an\u0131lan tahrifat\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir inceleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>O halde, mahkemece, bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131larak \u00f6ncelikle takip dayana\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ekin ke\u015fide tarihindeki paraf imzalar\u0131n, ke\u015fidecinin eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc de\u011filse \u00e7ekin ke\u015fide tarihinde tahrifat yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tahrifat var ise, ke\u015fide tarihinin tahrifattan \u00f6nceki ger\u00e7ek haliyle bankaya ibraz\u0131n s\u00fcresinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenmek suretiyle olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir denildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak; Karara g\u00f6re, bor\u00e7lunun <strong>ke\u015fide<\/strong> tarihi \u00fczerinde defalarca <strong>tahrifat<\/strong> kabul edilebilecek \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan bu de\u011fi\u015fikler ile at\u0131lan paraf imzalar\u0131n kime ait oldu\u011funun belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve an\u0131lan <strong>tahrifat<\/strong> \u00f6ncesi ke\u015fide tarihine g\u00f6re an\u0131lan \u00e7ekin ibraz\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde kabul edilemeyece\u011fine dair itirazlar\u0131 mevcuttur. Bu durumda, mahkemece, ke\u015fide tarihinde mevcut paraf <strong>imzalar<\/strong> ile an\u0131lan tahrifat\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Mahkemece, <strong>bilirki\u015fi<\/strong> <strong>incelemesi<\/strong> yapt\u0131r\u0131larak \u00f6ncelikle takip dayana\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ekin ke\u015fide tarihindeki <strong>paraf<\/strong> imzalar\u0131n, ke\u015fidecinin eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc de\u011filse \u00e7ekin ke\u015fide tarihinde tahrifat yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, <strong>tahrifat<\/strong> var ise, ke\u015fide tarihinin tahrifattan \u00f6nceki ger\u00e7ek haliyle bankaya ibraz\u0131n s\u00fcresinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenmelidir. Bu inceleme neticesinde olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmeli gerekmektedir denilmek suretiyle bozma karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 19.09.2018 tarih 2018\/11872 Esas ve\u00a0 2018\/8370 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7eke dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine \u00f6zg\u00fc haciz yolu ile ba\u015flat\u0131lan takipte; bor\u00e7lunun sair itirazlar\u0131 ile birlikte, takip dayana\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ekte tahrifat yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ke\u015fide tarihinin defalarca de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini ve at\u0131lan paraf imzalar\u0131n\u0131n kime ait oldu\u011funun belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahrifattan \u00f6nceki haliyle \u00e7ekin&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1230,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[32,53,52,17,67],"class_list":["post-1228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bilirkisi-raporu","tag-cek","tag-kesideci","tag-senet","tag-tahrifat"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1228"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1231,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228\/revisions\/1231"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1230"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}