{"id":1205,"date":"2023-12-06T23:42:22","date_gmt":"2023-12-06T23:42:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1205"},"modified":"2023-12-06T23:42:22","modified_gmt":"2023-12-06T23:42:22","slug":"yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2023\/12\/06\/yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-4\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARI &#8211; ADL\u0130 BELGE \u0130NCELEME"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 23.06.2020 tarih 2017\/4434 Esas ve 2020\/3008 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dava, inan\u00e7l\u0131 i\u015flem hukuksal nedenine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131lar, davac\u0131 &#8230; &#8230; Ticaret A.\u015e.&#8217;nin 1764 ada 37 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131, \u015firketin ekonomik s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131ya girmesi nedeniyle emaneten daval\u0131ya devretti\u011fini, daval\u0131n\u0131n da talep halinde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131 \u015firket yetkilisi davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;ya devrini kabul etti\u011fini, bu hususun taraflar aras\u0131nda akdedilen 05.06.2009 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile de belirlendi\u011fini, ancak daval\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 iadeye yana\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, 1764 ada 37 parseldeki 2, 4 ve 12 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin 1\/2 paylar\u0131n\u0131n tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile adlar\u0131na tesciline, olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde tazminata karar verilmesini istemi\u015fler, 10.06.2014 tarihli dilek\u00e7eleri dava konusu parselde yer alan 11 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn sehven eksik g\u00f6sterildi\u011fini belirterek an\u0131lan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131n da dava konusu oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki 1\/2 pay\u0131 &#8230;Ticaret A.\u015e.&#8217;den 30.06.2009 tarihinde sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 05.06.2009 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fmedeki imzan\u0131n da kendisine ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve toplanan delillerden; 1764 ada 137 parselin tamam\u0131 Ziraat Bankas\u0131 A.\u015e., ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 iken 30.06.2009 tarihinde 1\/2&#8217;\u015fer paylar ile \u0130nci Saat Telekom Elektronik Pazarlama A.\u015e., ile davac\u0131 &#8230;Ticaret A.\u015e.&#8217;ye, davac\u0131 &#8230; Ticaret A.\u015e.,\u2019yi temsilen davac\u0131 &#8230;\u2019n\u0131n 30.06.2009 tarihinde 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;a, &#8230;Telekom Elektronik Pazarlama A.\u015e.,\u2019nin 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131, 1\/4&#8217;er pay ile 15.1.2010 tarihinde &#8230;ve &#8230;&#8217;ya sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle devretti\u011fi, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde 22.6.2010 tarihinde tesis edilen kat m\u00fclkiyetinin 28.12.2010 tarihinde terkin edildi\u011fi 14.01.2011 tarihinde kat irtifak\u0131 tesis edilerek 2, 4, 11, 12 ve 14 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin daval\u0131 &#8230; Unsuz ad\u0131na tescil edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 &#8230; ile daval\u0131 &#8230; aras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 05.06.2009 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fme ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belge ile &#8230;\u2019un 1764 ada 347 parselde kay\u0131tl\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki &#8230;Tic A.\u015e.&#8217;ye ait olan %50 m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 emaneten devralaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu, Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi Adli Belge \u0130nceleme \u015eubesi\u2019nin 30.06.2015 tarihli raporuna g\u00f6re inceleme konusu 05.06.2009 tarihli belgede &#8230;&#8217;a atfen at\u0131l\u0131 imzan\u0131n &#8230;&#8217;un eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011fu ya da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir tespite gidilemedi\u011finin tespit edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere; inan\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, inananla inan\u0131lan aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan, onlar\u0131n hak ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen, inan\u00e7l\u0131 muamelenin sona erme sebeplerini ve devredilen hakk\u0131n, inan\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan inanana geri verme (iade) \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren bor\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir muameledir. Bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme, taraflar\u0131n\u0131n hak ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kapsayan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir akit olup, alacak ve m\u00fclkiyetin naklinin hukuki sebebini te\u015fkil eder. Taraflar b\u00f6yle bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u015flemle genellikle, teminat te\u015fkil etmek ve iade edilmek \u00fczere, mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dahil bir \u015fey veya hakk\u0131, ayn\u0131 amac\u0131 g\u00fcden ola\u011fan hukuki muamelelerden daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir hukuki durum yaratarak, inan\u0131lana inan\u00e7l\u0131 olarak kazand\u0131rmak i\u00e7in ba\u015fvururlar. Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla, bu i\u015flemle bor\u00e7lu, alacakl\u0131s\u0131na mal\u0131n\u0131 rehin edecek, yani yaln\u0131zca s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 ayni bir hak tan\u0131yacak yerde, mal\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetini ge\u00e7irerek rehin hakk\u0131ndan daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc, daha ileri giden bir hak tan\u0131r. S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 temlikin, de\u011finilen bu \u00f6zellikleri nedeniyle, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 inan\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile satan kimsenin art\u0131k sadece, \u00f6d\u00fcn\u00e7 alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu paray\u0131 geri vererek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 kendisine temlik edilmesini istemek yolunda bir alacak hakk\u0131; ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131, inan\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile alan kimsenin de borcun \u00f6denmesi g\u00fcn\u00fcne kadar ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 ba\u015fkas\u0131na satmamak ve bor\u00e7 \u00f6denince de geri vermek yolunda yaln\u0131zca bir borcu kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Uygulamada mesele, 05.02.1947 tarih 20\/6 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 ile ili\u015fkilendirilip, bu karar dayanak yap\u0131lmak suretiyle \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme gidilmektedir.S\u00f6z konusu kararda; eski hukuka g\u00f6re m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ve ge\u00e7erli olan muvazaa ve nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear iddialar\u0131n\u0131n, Medeni Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden sonra ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallar hakk\u0131nda dinlenip dinlenemeyece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan kararda; \u00e7e\u015fitli sebep ve ama\u00e7larla bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz kayd\u0131na ger\u00e7ek malik yerine ba\u015fka bir nam ve bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmede akitlerden biri yerine \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir \u015fahs\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, bu gibi hallerde vekilin kendi nam\u0131na ve m\u00fcvekkili hesab\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tasarruflarda oldu\u011fu gibi hukuki bir durum veya herhangi bir maksatla \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slardan ger\u00e7e\u011fi gizleme gayesi g\u00fcd\u00fclebilece\u011fi, \u201ck\u00f6t\u00fcniyetli ve haks\u0131z gizlemeler\u201d d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, belirtilen olas\u0131l\u0131klara g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131lacak bir davan\u0131n, ger\u00e7ekten, ya mevcut bir hakka dayanarak bir el de\u011fi\u015ftirme veya bir hakk\u0131n korunmas\u0131 niteli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131; bu durumun da, temsil ve vekalet ili\u015fkisinde, m\u00fclkiyette halefiyet esas\u0131 olarak kabul edilmi\u015f bir husus olup, halefiyeti d\u00fczeltme amac\u0131yla \u00f6ncelikle m\u00fclkiyetin vekile aidiyeti d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclse bile, temsil h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fundan bunun korunmas\u0131 ve devam\u0131na h\u00fckmolunamayaca\u011f\u0131, zira TBK&#8217;nin 509. maddesindeki \u201cVekilin, kendi ad\u0131na ve vek\u00e2let veren hesab\u0131na g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015flerden do\u011fan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerdeki alaca\u011f\u0131, vek\u00e2let verenin vekile kar\u015f\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ifa etti\u011fi anda, kendili\u011finden vek\u00e2let verene ge\u00e7er.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyi do\u011frulad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6te yandan gerek ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r, gerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallara ili\u015fkin olsun nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear hadiselerinde, meselenin bir istihkak ve m\u00fclkiyet davas\u0131 niteli\u011fini ge\u00e7emeyece\u011finden, ne resmi senet, ne de \u015fekil meselesinin bahse konu olamayaca\u011f\u0131, meselenin akitte ve isimde muvazaay\u0131 kapsam\u0131na alan TBK&#8217;nin 19. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmesinin kanunun amac\u0131na uygun d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fine, de\u011finildikten sonra sonu\u00e7ta, nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear davalar\u0131n\u0131n dinlenebilir ve yaz\u0131l\u0131 delil ile ispat\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funa, h\u00fckmolunmu\u015ftur.\u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Bile\u015ftirme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n konular\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131, sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 bulundu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear i\u00e7in d\u00fczenleme getiren 1947 tarihli karar\u0131n, teminat amac\u0131yla temlike dair inan\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerini kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da ku\u015fkusuzdur. Uygulamada an\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler gerek \u00f6z\u00fc, gerek i\u015fleyi\u015fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, genelde muvazaa, \u00f6zelde ise nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131 alt\u0131nda nitelendirile gelmektedir. Belirtilen \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131nda da de\u011finildi\u011fi \u00fczere; inan\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri bir yandan m\u00fclkiyeti nakil borcu do\u011furmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan taraflar\u0131 ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131, di\u011fer yandan, m\u00fclkiyetin naklinin sebebini te\u015fkil etmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tasarruf i\u015flemlerini b\u00fcnyesinde bar\u0131nd\u0131ran s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerdir. Bu durumda ko\u015fullar\u0131n olu\u015fmas\u0131 halinde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz m\u00fclkiyetini nakil \u00f6zelli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ifade olundu\u011fu \u00fczere, inan\u00e7l\u0131 i\u015fleme dayal\u0131 olup dinlenilirli\u011fi kabul edilen iddialar\u0131n ispat\u0131, \u015fekle ba\u011fl\u0131 olmayan yaz\u0131l\u0131 delildir. \u0130nan\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan bu belgenin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye taraf olanlar\u0131n imzas\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7ermesi gereklidir. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki bir kabul, hem \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi, hemde ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tapu d\u0131\u015f\u0131 sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131na olanak sa\u011flamak anlam\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131ndan kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerle ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lamaz. Hemen belirtilmelidir ki, davac\u0131 &#8230; ile daval\u0131 &#8230; aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan 05.06.2009 tarihli \u201c<strong>s\u00f6zle\u015fmedir<\/strong>\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belgedeki daval\u0131 &#8230;\u2019a atfen at\u0131l\u0131 imzan\u0131n Abdurrahman\u2019a aidiyetinin tespit halinde, an\u0131lan belgenin 05.02.1947 tarih 20\/6 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca inan\u00e7l\u0131 i\u015flemin belgesi niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Somut olayda, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesinin 05.06.2009 tarihli raporunda, \u201c<strong>s\u00f6zle\u015fmedir<\/strong>\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belgedeki daval\u0131 &#8230;\u2019a atfen at\u0131l\u0131 imzan\u0131n daval\u0131 &#8230;\u2019\u0131n eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilemedi\u011fi bildirilmi\u015f olup, rapor kanaat verici nitelikte bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen yeni bir uzman raporu temini yoluna gidilmemi\u015f, ayr\u0131ca 05.06.2009 tarihli belgede 1764 ada 347 parselden s\u00f6zedildi\u011fi, dava konusunun ise 1764 ada 37 parsel olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede belirtilen 1764 ada 347 parselin tapu kayd\u0131 getirtilmemi\u015f, an\u0131lan belgedeki parselin dava konusu 1764 ada 37 parsel olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da saptanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6te yandan, davac\u0131 taraf dava dilek\u00e7esinde 1764 ada 37 parseldeki 11 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istekte bulunmam\u0131\u015f, 10.6.2014 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile 11 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn de dava konusu oldu\u011funu belirterek maddi hatan\u0131n bu \u015fekilde giderilmesini istemi\u015f ise de; HMK&#8217;nun 183.maddesinde ancak a\u00e7\u0131k yaz\u0131 ve hesap hatalar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden maddi hata d\u00fczeltim talebinde bulunabilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlemesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, dava konusu edilmeyen bir \u015feyin maddi hata d\u00fczeltme dilek\u00e7esi ile dava konusu haline getirilmesine yasal a\u00e7\u0131dan olanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu ba\u011flamda 11 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden usul\u00fcnce a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir dava olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, 11 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 da do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; 05.06.2009 tarihli \u201cs\u00f6zle\u015fmedir\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belgedeki imzan\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda grafoloji alan\u0131nda uzman \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015filik bilirki\u015fi heyetinden rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131, an\u0131lan belgedeki 1764 ada 347 parselin tedav\u00fcll\u00fc tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n getirtilmesi, dava konusu parselle ili\u015fkisinin saptanmas\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n eksiksiz tamamlanmas\u0131 ve has\u0131l olacak sonuca g\u00f6re bir h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, 11 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir dava bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekirken noksan soru\u015fturma ile yetinilmek suretiyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir denildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak; kararda 11 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine karar verilmi\u015f, ayr\u0131ca 05.06.2009 tarihli \u201cs\u00f6zle\u015fmedir\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belgedeki imzan\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda <strong>grafoloji<\/strong> alan\u0131nda uzman \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015filik <strong>bilirki\u015fi<\/strong> heyetinden <strong>rapor<\/strong> al\u0131nmas\u0131, an\u0131lan belgedeki 1764 ada 347 parselin tedav\u00fcll\u00fc tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n getirtilerek, dava konusu parselle ili\u015fkisinin saptanmas\u0131 ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n eksiksiz tamamlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmek suretiyle bozma karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 23.06.2020 tarih 2017\/4434 Esas ve 2020\/3008 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Dava, inan\u00e7l\u0131 i\u015flem hukuksal nedenine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131lar, davac\u0131 &#8230; &#8230; Ticaret A.\u015e.&#8217;nin 1764 ada 37 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131, \u015firketin ekonomik s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131ya girmesi nedeniyle emaneten daval\u0131ya devretti\u011fini, daval\u0131n\u0131n da talep halinde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1206,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[43,54,59,57,58,56],"class_list":["post-1205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-adli-belge-inceleme","tag-grafoloji-uzmani","tag-grafomoji-uzmani","tag-imza-incelemesi","tag-imza-yazi-inceleme","tag-sozlesme"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1205"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1205"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1207,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1205\/revisions\/1207"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}