{"id":1154,"date":"2023-11-11T15:52:26","date_gmt":"2023-11-11T15:52:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1154"},"modified":"2023-11-11T15:52:26","modified_gmt":"2023-11-11T15:52:26","slug":"bolge-adliye-mahkemesi-karari-raporlar-arasi-celiski-uzman-gorusu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2023\/11\/11\/bolge-adliye-mahkemesi-karari-raporlar-arasi-celiski-uzman-gorusu\/","title":{"rendered":"B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI &#8211; Raporlar Aras\u0131 \u00c7eli\u015fki &#8211; Uzman G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>\u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 17. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 23.03.2022 tarih, 2019\/706 Esas ve 2022\/548 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin \u0130zmir &#8230; yetkili bayiisi olan daval\u0131 \u015firketten, 02\/03\/2015 tarihinde 2 adet PNVAN ara\u00e7 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kamyonet tipi bu ara\u00e7lar\u0131 y\u00fck ta\u015f\u0131ma amac\u0131 ile ve t\u00fcketici kredisi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak ara\u00e7lar\u0131n sat\u0131n al\u0131nmalar\u0131ndan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra ar\u0131zaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu ar\u0131zan\u0131n yetkili servis taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenemedi\u011finden tekrarland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, gizli ay\u0131pl\u0131 ve \u00fcretim hatas\u0131 bulunan iki ara\u00e7 i\u00e7in sat\u0131\u015f bedeli olan 47.978,60 TLx2 ve sat\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 ile ara\u00e7lar i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan masraf 6.702,06TL olmak \u00fczere toplam 102.659,26 TLnin daval\u0131lardan \u00f6deme tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek ticari faizi ile m\u00fc\u015ftereken tahsili istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, dava konusu ara\u00e7lar\u0131n t\u00fcketici kredisi al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeni ile, t\u00fcketici mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli olmas\u0131 nedeni ile, g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, g\u00f6nderilen t\u00fcketici mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan, kamyonet cinsindeki ara\u00e7lar\u0131n y\u00fck ta\u015f\u0131ma i\u015finde kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususununu dava dilek\u00e7esinde belirtildi\u011finden, g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilerek, mercii tayini i\u00e7in g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay 20 H.D. taraf\u0131ndan Asliye ticaret mahkemesinin yarg\u0131 yeri olarak belirlenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Yerel mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan, mercii tayini ile d\u00f6nen dosya makina ve hukuk bilirki\u015fileri incelemesine g\u00f6nderilerek, dava konusu ara\u00e7larda gizli ay\u0131p veya \u00fcretim hatas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ara\u00e7taki sorunlar\u0131n kullan\u0131m hatas\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilerek, bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 10\/08\/2017 tarihinde, dava konusu ara\u00e7lar\u0131n sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilerek, maddi ve manevi tazminat talebi olarak davan\u0131n \u0131slah edilerek, 62.659,26TL. Maddi ve 40.000 TL manevi tazminat talebi ile davaya devam ile, har\u00e7 ikmal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, b\u00fct\u00fcn dosya kapsam\u0131 ve al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131na g\u00f6re; davac\u0131n\u0131n &#8230; A\u015e&#8217;nin \u0130zmirdeki &#8230; yetkili bayii olan &#8230; A\u015e&#8217;den dava konusu 2 adet arac\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kullan\u0131m\u0131 esnas\u0131nda ara\u00e7lar\u0131n mar\u015f\u0131n\u0131n basmamas\u0131 sebebiyle ar\u0131za yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, ar\u0131zan\u0131n giderilmesi i\u00e7in servis onar\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak yap\u0131lan servis onar\u0131mlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen mar\u015f ar\u0131zas\u0131 sorununun devam etti\u011finden bahisle ara\u00e7 bedellerinin ve ara\u00e7lar i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan masraf\u0131n daval\u0131lardan tahsilinin talep edildi\u011fi, toplanan deliller ve al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re, ara\u00e7larda teknik kusurun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusurun kullan\u0131mdan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, mar\u015f\u0131n basmamas\u0131n\u0131n teknik olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve arac\u0131 koruma \u00f6nlemi olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, ara\u00e7lar\u0131n vitesdeyken \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi i\u00e7in koruma \u00f6nleminin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 teknik a\u00e7\u0131klama kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re ara\u00e7larda herhangi bir kusurun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve iadesinin ve bedelinin tahsilinin gerekmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurarak, davan\u0131n \u0131slah edilerek, maddi ve manevi tazminat taleplerine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine ra\u011fmen \u0131slah taleplerinin dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, ara\u00e7lar\u0131n sat\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra ar\u0131zalanmaya ba\u015flamas\u0131na,23\/04\/2015 tarihinde itibaren her bir arac\u0131n 5-8 kez servise g\u00f6nderilmesinin g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131larak, i\u015f emirlerinin de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini, bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmedi\u011fini, yerel mahkeme karan\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>Dava, sat\u0131ma konu ara\u00e7larda ay\u0131p bulunmas\u0131 ve ara\u00e7lar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 nedeni ile, maddi ve manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130stinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusuna konu edilen karar hakk\u0131nda; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 355. maddesindeki d\u00fczenleme gere\u011fince, istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde belirtilen nedenler ve kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak inceleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n makine bilirki\u015fisinden <strong>uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/strong> ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe g\u00f6re, ara\u00e7ta gizli ve \u00fcretim hatas\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, ara\u00e7lar\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131yor \u015fikayeti ile gelmesi, sigorta ve r\u00f6lesinin tekraren de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini, ar\u0131zan\u0131n giderilemedi\u011fi, kullan\u0131m hatas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015f, talimat ile makine bilirki\u015fisinden al\u0131nan k\u00f6k ve ek raporda ise, ara\u00e7taki ar\u0131zalar\u0131n kullan\u0131m hatas\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, gizli ay\u0131p veya \u00fcretim hatas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, <strong>uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/strong> ile <strong>bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 <\/strong>aras\u0131nda <strong>\u00e7eli\u015fki<\/strong> bulunmakta olup, bu \u00e7eli\u015fki, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporuna itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilerek, giderilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>HMK\u2019n\u0131n 266. maddesi uyar\u0131nca mahkeme, \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc hukuk d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, \u00f6zel veya teknik bilgiyi gerektiren hallerde, taraflardan birinin talebi \u00fczerine yahut kendili\u011finden, dosyada <strong>bilirki\u015fi<\/strong> <strong>incelemesi<\/strong> yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve inceleme konusu hakk\u0131nda <strong>bilirki\u015finin<\/strong> oy ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verebilir.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde dosyaya sunulan uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ile dosyada m\u00fcbrez bilirki\u015fi raporu farkl\u0131 ve z\u0131t g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler i\u00e7erebilir ve hatta tamamen birbiriyle \u00e7eli\u015fir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri i\u00e7eriyor olabilir. Bu durumda, Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi, 10.11.2016 tarih, 2015\/5127 E. ve 2016\/4635 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, <strong>bilirki\u015fi raporu<\/strong> ile taraflardan biri taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya sunulan uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fkiler bulunmas\u0131 halinde, \u00e7eli\u015fkilerin giderilmesi amac\u0131yla dosyan\u0131n \u201cyeni bir <strong>bilirki\u015fi heyetine<\/strong>\u201d tevdii edilmesi gerekti\u011fine h\u00fckmetmi\u015f ve bunun gerek\u00e7esi olarak, uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc sunan taraf\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali olu\u015fabilece\u011fine vurgu yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p>O halde, dava ile h\u00fck\u00fcm ve gerek\u00e7e aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fki bulundu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n tazminat talepleri hakk\u0131nda <strong>uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/strong> ile <strong>bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131<\/strong> aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmedi\u011fi hususlar\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na denildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak; Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n makine bilirki\u015fisinden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 <strong>uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne<\/strong> g\u00f6re, ara\u00e7ta gizli ve \u00fcretim hatas\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, ancak, mahkemece istenen bilirki\u015fi raporunda, ara\u00e7taki ar\u0131zalar\u0131n kullan\u0131m hatas\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, gizli ay\u0131p veya \u00fcretim hatas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, bu durumda, <strong>uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/strong> ile <strong>bilirki\u015fi<\/strong> raporlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015ftu\u011fu, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmesi gerekti\u011fini talep ederek yeni bir <strong>bilirki\u015fi incelemesi<\/strong> talebinde bulundu\u011fu, ancak mahkemece davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n <strong>bilirki\u015fi raporu<\/strong>na itiraz\u0131 reddedilerek, bu uyumsuzluk giderilmeden karar verilmesi eksik inceleme gerek\u00e7esiyle bozma karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 17. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 23.03.2022 tarih, 2019\/706 Esas ve 2022\/548 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin \u0130zmir &#8230; yetkili bayiisi olan daval\u0131 \u015firketten, 02\/03\/2015 tarihinde 2 adet PNVAN ara\u00e7 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kamyonet tipi bu ara\u00e7lar\u0131 y\u00fck ta\u015f\u0131ma amac\u0131 ile ve t\u00fcketici kredisi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak ara\u00e7lar\u0131n sat\u0131n al\u0131nmalar\u0131ndan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra ar\u0131zaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1155,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[20,32,31,23],"class_list":["post-1154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bilirkisi","tag-bilirkisi-raporu","tag-celiski","tag-uzman-gorusu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1154"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1154"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1156,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1154\/revisions\/1156"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1155"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}