{"id":1146,"date":"2023-10-14T14:26:07","date_gmt":"2023-10-14T14:26:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1146"},"modified":"2023-10-14T14:26:07","modified_gmt":"2023-10-14T14:26:07","slug":"yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2023\/10\/14\/yargitay-karari-adli-belge-inceleme-2\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARI &#8211; Adli Belge \u0130nceleme"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 24.06.2013 tarihli 2013\/20100 Esas 2013\/23746 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>\u00d6ZET: Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yoluyla icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, bor\u00e7lunun, imzaya itiraz ederek takibin iptali istemi ile icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <strong>Adli T\u0131p Kurumu<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporda <strong>imzan\u0131n bor\u00e7lu eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc<\/strong> olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda net bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmemi\u015ftir. Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yeni bir bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edildi\u011fine g\u00f6re mahkemece ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn alacakl\u0131da oldu\u011fu kural\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak yeniden uzman bilirki\u015filerden olu\u015fturulacak kuruldan rapor al\u0131narak karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>DAVA: Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131n\u0131 mutazamm\u0131n 31.01.2013 tarih, 26747\/2997 say\u0131l\u0131 daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde tashihen tetkiki alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>KARAR : Alacakl\u0131 T. Vak\u0131flar Bankas\u0131 T.A.O. vekili taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan temyiz ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine Yalova \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi 24.07.2012 tarih ve 2011\/576 esas, 2012\/272 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n Dairemizin 31.01.2013 tarih ve 2012\/26747 esas, 2013\/2997 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en bor\u00e7lunun yasal s\u00fcrede karar d\u00fczeltme talebinde bulundu\u011fu, ancak Dairemizce maddi hataya dayal\u0131 olarak ba\u015fvurunun temyiz istemi olarak de\u011ferlendirilerek 02.05.2013 tarih ve 2013\/11740-16875 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam ile mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozuldu\u011fu mahkemece dosyan\u0131n maddi hatan\u0131 d\u00fczeltilmesi istemi ile Dairemize g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda alacakl\u0131n\u0131n 07.03.2013 tarihli karar d\u00fczeltme itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine bu konuda inceleme yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ikinci defa temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine verilen karar yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde olmakla, Dairemizin 04.06.2012 tarih ve 2012\/7779-19012 say\u0131l\u0131 bozma ilam\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle maddi hatan\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesine oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildikten sonra alacakl\u0131 vekilinin Dairemizin 31.01.2013 tarih ve 2012\/26747 esas, 2013\/2997 karar say\u0131l\u0131 onama ilam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik 07.03.2013 tarihli karar d\u00fczeltme itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine ge\u00e7ildi: Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo <strong>senet<\/strong>lerine mahsus haciz yoluyla icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rnek 10 numaral\u0131 \u00f6deme emri tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine bor\u00e7lunun, imzaya itiraz ederek takibin iptali istemi ile icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece imza incelemesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n Adli T\u0131p Kurumuna g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en kurum taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 13.06.2012 tarihli raporda, bonodaki imzalar\u0131n bor\u00e7lu ke\u015fidecinin eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunun tespit edilemedi\u011finin bildirildi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n ise 24.07.2012 tarihli celsede yeniden <strong>bilirki\u015fi<\/strong> <strong>raporu<\/strong> al\u0131narak <strong>imzan\u0131n<\/strong> bor\u00e7luya ait olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesini talep etti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporda imzan\u0131n bor\u00e7lu eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda net bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmemi\u015ftir. Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yeni bir <strong>bilirki\u015fi<\/strong> incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edildi\u011fine g\u00f6re mahkemece ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn alacakl\u0131da oldu\u011fu kural\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak yeniden <strong>uzman<\/strong> <strong>bilirki\u015fi<\/strong>lerden olu\u015fturulacak kuruldan rapor al\u0131narak sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsiz olup karar\u0131n bu nedenlerle bozulmas\u0131 gerekirken Dairemizce onand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, alacakl\u0131 vekilinin karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin kabul\u00fc gerekmi\u015ftir.\u201ddenildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6zetle; <strong>bono<\/strong>daki imzalar\u0131n bor\u00e7luya ait olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n <strong>Adli T\u0131p Kurumuna<\/strong> g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, ancak kurum <strong>imza<\/strong>lar\u0131n sahibini tespit edemedi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yeni bir <strong>bilirki\u015fi raporu<\/strong> istendi\u011fi, ancak mahkeme bunu reddetti\u011fi, Alacakl\u0131 taraf karar\u0131 temyiz etti\u011fi ve Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan alacakl\u0131n\u0131n ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fc dikkate alarak <strong>yeni bir bilirki\u015fi<\/strong> <strong>incelemesi<\/strong> yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 24.06.2013 tarihli 2013\/20100 Esas 2013\/23746 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; \u00a0\u00d6ZET: Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bonoya dayal\u0131 olarak kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yoluyla icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, bor\u00e7lunun, imzaya itiraz ederek takibin iptali istemi ile icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporda imzan\u0131n bor\u00e7lu eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda net bir&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1148,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[22,20,24,16,18,17,23],"class_list":["post-1146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-adli-tip-kurumu","tag-bilirkisi","tag-bono","tag-imza","tag-rapor","tag-senet","tag-uzman-gorusu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1146"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1146"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1146\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1149,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1146\/revisions\/1149"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}