{"id":1139,"date":"2023-10-14T13:48:55","date_gmt":"2023-10-14T13:48:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/?p=1139"},"modified":"2023-10-14T13:48:55","modified_gmt":"2023-10-14T13:48:55","slug":"yargitay-kararlari-uzman-gorusu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/2023\/10\/14\/yargitay-kararlari-uzman-gorusu\/","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY KARARLARI &#8211; Uzman G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 31.03.2016 tarihli, 2015\/7580 Esas ve 2016\/3513 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>DAVA: Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada&#8230;.Fikr\u00ee ve S\u0131na\u00ee Haklar Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nce verilen 26.12.2014 tarih ve 2012\/250-2014\/348 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak incelenmesi daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f olup, duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 29.3.2016 g\u00fcn\u00fc haz\u0131r bulunan davac\u0131lar vekili Av&#8230;. ile daval\u0131lar vekili Av. &#8230; dinlenildikten sonra duru\u015fmal\u0131 i\u015flerin yo\u011funlu\u011fu ve s\u00fcre darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ileriye b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131. Tetkik Hakimi &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlenildikten ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>KARAR: Davac\u0131lar vekili, m\u00fcvekkili &#8230;&#8217;nin 1960 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri &#8230;. ticaret unvan\u0131 ile end\u00fcstriyel lamba sekt\u00f6r\u00fcnde faaliyet g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, &#8216;&#8230; ibareli tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f markalar\u0131n sahibi oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkili &#8230; ile daval\u0131lar aras\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretilen \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;de sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 konusunda distrib\u00fct\u00f6rl\u00fck anla\u015fmas\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu anla\u015fma kapsam\u0131nda taraflar\u0131n bir m\u00fcddet \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu anla\u015fma devam ederken ve m\u00fcvekkili &#8230; ad\u0131na 11. s\u0131n\u0131fta 2002\/28441 tescil numaral\u0131 &#8220;&#8230;&#8221; markas\u0131 varken daval\u0131lardan&#8230;&#8217;nin 2010\/08230 tescil numaral\u0131 &#8230;.+\u015fekil markas\u0131n\u0131 35 ve 37. s\u0131n\u0131flarda, 2010\/60415 tescil numaras\u0131yla 35. s\u0131n\u0131fta &#8230;nezdinde tescil ettirdi\u011fini, &#8230;&#8217;nin ortaklar\u0131 ile &#8230;&#8217;nin ortaklar\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 ki\u015filer oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkili ile daval\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki distrib\u00fct\u00f6rl\u00fck ili\u015fkisinin 19.12.2011 tarihinde sona erdi\u011fini, 20.4.2012 tarihinde m\u00fcvekkili &#8230;i&#8217;nin kuruldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin bu \u015firket \u00fczerinden \u00fcr\u00fcnlerini T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;de pazarlama ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131na karar verdi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili ile daval\u0131 &#8230; A\u015e aras\u0131ndaki distrib\u00fct\u00f6rl\u00fck ili\u015fkisi sona erdi\u011finden daval\u0131n\u0131n &#8230;. markas\u0131n\u0131 kullanma hakk\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, &#8230;. markas\u0131n\u0131 kullanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n 556 Say\u0131l\u0131 KHK ve&#8230; Protokol\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde m\u00fcvekkiline ait oldu\u011funu, distrib\u00fct\u00f6rl\u00fck ili\u015fkisinin sona ermesi sebebiyle m\u00fcvekkilinin \u201c&#8230;.\u201d markas\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131m\u0131na muvafakat etmedi\u011fini, &#8230;. ibaresinin daval\u0131larca internet alan ad\u0131 ve ticaret unvan\u0131 olarak da kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 &#8230; A\u015e&#8217;nin \u201c&#8230;.&#8221; ibaresini kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa ve m\u00fcvekkilin zarara u\u011framas\u0131na neden olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, daval\u0131lardan &#8230;ad\u0131na tescilli 2010\/08230 numaral\u0131 &#8230;.+\u015fekil ve 2010\/&#8230; &#8230;.+\u015fekil ibareli markalar\u0131n 556 Say\u0131l\u0131 KHK h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcvekkili &#8230;&#8217;ye devrine yahut h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, daval\u0131 &#8230; A\u015e ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 bulunan &#8230;alan ad\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkillerden T\u00fcrk &#8230;&#8217;ne devri ve tescilinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, daval\u0131lardan&#8230;&#8217;nin ticaret unvan\u0131nda yer alan &#8220;&#8230;.&#8221; ibaresinin kanuna uygun bir \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesine veya silinmesine, tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn sonucu olan maddi durumun ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ilgili ara\u00e7lar\u0131n ve ilgili mallar\u0131n, bro\u015f\u00fcr, tan\u0131t\u0131m ve her t\u00fcrl\u00fc evrak\u0131n imhas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131lar vekili, taraflar aras\u0131nda tek sat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ili\u015fkisi bulundu\u011funu, &#8230;. ibareli markalar\u0131n ilk defa m\u00fcvekkil \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan ..&#8217;de tescil ettirildi\u011fini, &#8230;. ibaresine ticaret unvan\u0131nda ilk olarak yer verenin ve markay\u0131 kullanan\u0131n m\u00fcvekkil \u015firket oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilinin 2004 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri bu ibareyi marka olarak ve ticaret unvan\u0131nda kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fini ve bu duruma r\u0131za g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, davac\u0131 \u015firketlerin 556 Say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;n\u0131n 11. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayanamayacaklar\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkil firman\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n izni ve talebi \u00fczerine markay\u0131 tescil ettirdi\u011fini, y\u0131llarca kullan\u0131p piyasada tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f hale getirdi\u011fini, hakl\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle markay\u0131 kullanmaya devam etti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkil \u015firketin markas\u0131n\u0131 35. ve 37. s\u0131n\u0131fta tescil ettirdi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n markas\u0131n\u0131n 11. s\u0131n\u0131fta tescilli oldu\u011funu, &#8230;. markas\u0131n\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;de bilinir hale m\u00fcvekkilinin getirdi\u011fini, y\u0131llard\u0131r ticari faaliyetinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 internet sitesinin devrinin veya h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn istenmesinin yasaya ve hakkaniyete ayk\u0131r\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, iddia, savunma, bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131lardan &#8230;&#8217;nin 1995-2004 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda davac\u0131lardan &#8230;L&#8217;nin distrib\u00fct\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, 2004 senesinde davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;nin talebi \u00fczerine di\u011fer daval\u0131 &#8230; &#8230;.&#8217;nin kuruldu\u011fu, &#8230; ile daval\u0131 &#8230; A&#8230;. aras\u0131nda 2004 senesinden 19.12.2011 tarihine kadar distrib\u00fct\u00f6rl\u00fck s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, davac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 19.12.2011 tarihli yaz\u0131 ile distrib\u00fct\u00f6rl\u00fck s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sona erdi\u011fi, 2002\/&#8230; numaral\u0131 &#8230;. ibareli 11. s\u0131n\u0131fta tescilli markan\u0131n davac\u0131lardan &#8230; ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, &#8230; ibaresinin gerek marka gerekse ticaret unvan\u0131 olarak 1960 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri i\u015f ve faaliyetlerinde &#8230;. \u0130talya taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve&#8230;nezdinde tescilli olup sekt\u00f6rde tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir marka oldu\u011fu, daval\u0131lar\u0131n &#8220;&#8230;.&#8221; ibaresini kullanmalar\u0131 ve marka olarak tescil ettirmelerinin davac\u0131larla olan distrib\u00fct\u00f6rl\u00fck anla\u015fmas\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ibare \u00fczerinde aslen hak sahibi olmad\u0131klar\u0131, davac\u0131 &#8230; \u0130talya firmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ncelikli hak sahibi oldu\u011fu, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tek sat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi sonland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n KHK&#8217;n\u0131n 17. maddesine g\u00f6re markan\u0131n kendisi ad\u0131na devrini yahut 42.ci madde kapsam\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc talep edebilece\u011fi, bilirki\u015fi raporu h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaya elveri\u015fli olmasada hukuki de\u011ferlendirmenin hakimce yap\u0131labilece\u011fi, dosyaya sunulan Uzman G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn daha teknik ve doyurucu mahiyette de\u011ferlendirmelerde bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle daval&#8230;r ad\u0131na tescilli 2010&#8230; tescil numaral\u0131 &#8230;. + \u015eekil markas\u0131n\u0131n KHK&#8217;nin 17. maddesi uyar\u0131nca davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8230;&#8217;ye devrine, daval\u0131 &#8230; ..&#8217;nin unvan\u0131n\u0131&#8230;I olarak kullan\u0131m\u0131 ve davaya konu olan&#8230;. alan ad\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 marka hakk\u0131na tecav\u00fcz ve haks\u0131z rekabet olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn ve haks\u0131z rekabetin \u00f6nlenmesine, www&#8230;.com.tr.alan ad\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrk &#8230;.i&#8217;ne devrine ve tesciline, daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8230;.&#8217;nin ticaret unvan\u0131ndaki &#8230;. ibaresinin \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak sicilden terkinine, maddi durumun ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak &#8230;. ibaresinin markasal kullan\u0131m\u0131na dair t\u00fcm bro\u015f\u00fcr, tan\u0131t\u0131m vs. her t\u00fcrl\u00fc evra\u011fa el konularak imhas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131, daval\u0131lar vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Dava, daval\u0131 \u015firket ad\u0131na tescilli markalar\u0131n devri, olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 taktirde h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, internet alan ad\u0131n\u0131n iptali yahut devri, ticaret unvan\u0131n terkini ile marka hakk\u0131na tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn, haks\u0131z rekabetin \u00f6nlenmesi istemlerine ili\u015fkindir. Yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan \u00f6zetten de anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere mahkemece, uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne itibar edilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun 293. maddesinde \u201ctaraflar\u0131n, davaya konu olayla ilgili olarak, uzman\u0131ndan bilimsel m\u00fctalaa alabilece\u011fi, sadece bu sebeple ayr\u0131ca s\u00fcre istenemeyece\u011fi, hakimin, talep \u00fczerine veya resen, kendisinden rapor al\u0131nan uzman ki\u015fiyi davet ederek dinlenilmesine karar verebilece\u011fi, uzman ki\u015finin \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fmada hakimin ve taraflar\u0131n gerekli sorular\u0131 sorabilece\u011fi, uzman ki\u015finin \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fmaya ge\u00e7erli bir \u00f6zr\u00fc olmadan gelmemesi halinde haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu raporun mahkemece de\u011ferlendirmeye tabi tutulmayaca\u011f\u0131\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re taraflar\u0131n bilirki\u015fi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda uzman\u0131ndan bilimsel nitelikli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f almalar\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup, b\u00f6ylece \u00f6zel ve teknik konularda taraflar\u0131n uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnden yararlanmalar\u0131, iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerle desteklemeleri m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olacakt\u0131r. Uzman ki\u015finin dinlenilmesi imkan\u0131n\u0131n getirilmesiyle bir yandan uzmanl\u0131k gerektiren konular\u0131n daha iyi ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131, di\u011fer yandan \u00e7eli\u015fkili ya da eksik veya yanl\u0131\u015f bilgilerle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesi ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta davac\u0131lar vekilince,&#8230;&#8217;den al\u0131nan ve 26.12.2014 tarihli celse dosyaya ibraz edilen m\u00fctalaa mahkemece, uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131lar vekili ise s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fctaalay\u0131 inceleyip beyanda bulunmak \u00fczere s\u00fcre istemi\u015ftir. Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesine g\u00f6re herkes, me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak suretiyle yarg\u0131 merciileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulamaya y\u00f6nelik uzant\u0131s\u0131 niteli\u011findedir. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta daval\u0131lar vekilinin, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n ibraz etti\u011fi mahkemenin de uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc olarak nitelendirdi\u011fi uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli ve makul s\u00fcre verilmeden yukarda \u00f6zetlendi\u011fi \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Bu durumda mahkemece, HMK&#8217;nun 293. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen usul ve esaslara uyulup, daval\u0131lar vekiline savunma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131narak olu\u015facak sonu\u00e7 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde karar verilmesi gerekirken HMK&#8217;nun 293. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc nazara al\u0131nmadan ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furacak \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131l\u0131p yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.\u201d Denilerek bozma karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6zetle;<\/p>\n<p>Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131, hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn pratikte ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini sa\u011flayan bir ilkedir. Bu ilke gere\u011fi, taraflar\u0131n iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 sunma, delillerini ibraz etme ve bunlara kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kma imkan\u0131 bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r. Somut olayda, davac\u0131n\u0131n sundu\u011fu ve mahkemenin uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc olarak kabul etti\u011fi rapora kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131n\u0131n vekilinin beyan vermesi i\u00e7in yeterli ve makul bir s\u00fcre tan\u0131nmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali anlam\u0131na gelmektedir. Bu nedenle mahkemece, HMK&#8217;nun 293. maddesinde belirtilen usul ve esaslara uygun olarak, daval\u0131n\u0131n vekiline savunma hakk\u0131 verilip, ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, HMK&#8217;nun 293. maddesi g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlayacak \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131larak yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi hatal\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen 31.03.2016 tarihli, 2015\/7580 Esas ve 2016\/3513 Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; DAVA: Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada&#8230;.Fikr\u00ee ve S\u0131na\u00ee Haklar Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nce verilen 26.12.2014 tarih ve 2012\/250-2014\/348 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak incelenmesi daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f olup, duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 29.3.2016 g\u00fcn\u00fc haz\u0131r bulunan davac\u0131lar vekili Av&#8230;. ile daval\u0131lar vekili Av. &#8230;&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1140,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1139"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1141,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions\/1141"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mecidiyekoywebtasarim.com\/istanbulkriminalofis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}